← Home

Fixed plant planning

At the plant, you don't waste a maintenance window

Crushers, conveyors, mills. The cycle is more predictable, so every planned window should be full. In practice, you find out the day before that a part isn't there or that the crew is committed elsewhere.

Today

01

The cycle is predictable, but maintenance windows are still poorly used.

02

Resource and parts conflicts are discovered when the job starts.

03

Work orders, parts and crew availability aren't consolidated anywhere.

Consolidation

Work orders, parts and crew in the same window

Group everything that has to be done while the asset is down, confirm parts and crew availability, then fill the window instead of promising it blind.

Control

The planner validates and prioritizes before committing the window

A work order without a confirmed part doesn't take another one's place. Priorities are settled in the view, not in an email.

What changes

Before and after

TodayWith PlanMI
Maintenance window underused for lack of coordinationWindow planned with parts and crew confirmed in advance
Resource conflict discovered when the job startsConflict detected at the planning stage
Parts tracking disconnected from the planParts availability visible in the same plan
No visibility on the gap between planned and actual hoursActual hours compared against the plan, by asset

Three stages

What holds the scenario together

  1. CONSOLIDATION

    Work orders, parts, crew

    Everything about an asset's window ends up in one place.

  2. DETECTION

    Resource conflicts

    Crews already committed, unconfirmed parts, overlapping windows.

  3. ANALYSIS

    Actual hours vs. plan

    Variances surface by asset, so cycles can be revised with data.

From plan to execution

The validated window becomes an executable work order

Who it's for

The people who live this use case every day

  • Maintenance planner
  • Fixed plant maintenance superintendent
  • Storekeepers and procurement

Frequently asked questions

What we hear, and how we answer

We already handle this in Excel, and it works.

It works until the day the person who maintains the file is gone, or until a window is lost for want of a part. PlanMI doesn't replace the CMMS; it eliminates the shadow file.

How do you handle parts availability?

The status of the parts a work order requires is among the upcoming features on the roadmap, and integration with your inventory system is validated site by site. Nothing is announced before it's confirmed.

Our team isn't tech-savvy.

The interface is designed for a planner: a Gantt view and drag and drop, not one more complex system to learn.

What was the last maintenance window you lost, and why?

Thirty minutes with your planner and your real data, and we'll see whether it holds up.

Aerial view of an overland conveyor crossing mining terrain