Requirements are already broken down
Protocols are structured requirement by requirement, with their levels. You answer; you don't retype the standard into a spreadsheet.
Case 01
The auditor arrives in eight weeks. The question is no longer finding the evidence, but reviewing what's already been assessed.
Compliance lead, environmental superintendent
Self-assessment — Indigenous and Community Relationships — 2025-06-30
2025Indigenous and Community Rel…v2021Give feedbackAADeleteHave communities of interest been identified?
YesNoPartialN/A• Map of communities of interest updated in 2025
6 piece(s) of evidenceAdd a taskReviewAuditIs a process to identify communities of interest being developed?
YesNoPartialN/A• Map of communities of interest updated in 2025
6 piece(s) of evidenceAdd a taskReviewAuditIs there a documented, facility-wide process to identify communities of interest that captures a broad range of interests and concerns?
YesNoPartialN/A• Map of communities of interest updated in 2025
6 piece(s) of evidence7 piece(s) of evidenceAdd a taskReviewAuditDoes this process also include: A mechanism for communities of interest to self-identify?
YesNoPartialN/A• Newsletter sign-up form on the website home page so the public can register their interest (2021) • Sign-up to the neighbors’ newsletter
7 piece(s) of evidenceAdd a taskReviewAuditDoes this process also include: A description of the relevant characteristics of the identified communities of interest, and a process to keep that information current?
YesNoPartialN/A• Newsletter sign-up form on the website home page so the public can register their interest (2021) • Sign-up to the neighbors’ newsletter
7 piece(s) of evidenceAdd a taskReviewAuditThe context
Before every cycle, the team sets its regular work aside and goes back to hunting for evidence that was already produced once. It exists, someone put it together, but it's spread across three departments, two generations of shared folders and an email inbox.
The master file, meanwhile, has five versions. Nobody knows which one was used for the last cycle, what's been changed since, or by whom.
The worst part isn't the workload. It's discovering a gap during the rebuild, with no time to fix it before the visit.
The Reglo answer
Protocols are structured requirement by requirement, with their levels. You answer; you don't retype the standard into a spreadsheet.
Compliant, non-compliant, partial or not applicable, with its written finding. The compliance rate and the gaps recalculate as the answers come in.
The supporting document is linked to the requirement with its exact reference. The auditor doesn't ask twice where it's written.
It's generated from live data, structured the way the auditor expects. You pull it whenever you want, not only when you're ready.
Indigenous and Community Relationships
v2021RACL–1IND1 - Identification of communities of interest13RACL–1–1BHave communities of interest been identified?
RACL–1–2BIs a process to identify communities of interest being developed?
RACL–1–3AIs there a documented, facility-wide process to identify communities of interest?
RACL–1–4ADoes this process let communities of interest self-identify?
RACL–2IND2 - Effective engagement and dialogue31RACL–3IND3 - Engagement with Indigenous peoples31RACL–4IND4 - Managing impacts and benefits28RACL–5IND5 - Feedback mechanism19Compliance rate
89.3%90.2%
Compliant
109110
Gaps
1312
Recalculated with every answer
RACL–2–3AYesNoPartialN/ADo the concerns raised receive a documented response?
• Concerns register kept up to date (2025)
RACL–2–4AYesNoPartialN/AIs the engagement process reviewed with communities?
• Annual review with the liaison committee, June 2025
RACL–2–5AAYesNoPartialN/AAre engagement outcomes reported publicly?
• Annual report published; summary for communities to come
RACL–1–3AYes
Is there a documented, facility-wide process to identify communities of interest?
Linked evidence
Community engagement plan 2025p. 14Concerns register 2025p. 33.2 Identifying communities of interest
The map of communities of interest is reviewed every year with the liaison committee, then recorded in the register.RACL–1–3
Audit report — TSM 2025Live data
Structure
Content
Self-assessment — Indigenous and Community Relationships — 2025-06-30
2025Indigenous and Community Rel…v2021Give feedbackAADeleteHave communities of interest been identified?
YesNoPartialN/A• Map of communities of interest updated in 2025
6 piece(s) of evidenceAdd a taskReviewAuditIs a process to identify communities of interest being developed?
YesNoPartialN/A• Map of communities of interest updated in 2025
6 piece(s) of evidenceAdd a taskReviewAuditIs there a documented, facility-wide process to identify communities of interest that captures a broad range of interests and concerns?
YesNoPartialN/A• Map of communities of interest updated in 2025
6 piece(s) of evidence7 piece(s) of evidenceAdd a taskReviewAuditDoes this process also include: A mechanism for communities of interest to self-identify?
YesNoPartialN/A• Newsletter sign-up form on the website home page so the public can register their interest (2021) • Sign-up to the neighbors’ newsletter
7 piece(s) of evidenceAdd a taskReviewAuditDoes this process also include: A description of the relevant characteristics of the identified communities of interest, and a process to keep that information current?
YesNoPartialN/A• Newsletter sign-up form on the website home page so the public can register their interest (2021) • Sign-up to the neighbors’ newsletter
7 piece(s) of evidenceAdd a taskReviewAuditProtocol results
AAOverall TSM level
AAAA2 indicators1 indicator
AAA3 indicators4 indicators
Computed on 2026-06-23 13:17:00Computed on 2026-06-23 13:18:04
The result
Fifteen minutes on one of your standards, with a case like this one.
Audit report
Live dataReport content